Location Research Breakthrough Possible @S-Logix pro@slogix.in

Automated SQL Injection Vulnerability Repair in OWASP Juice Shop Using SVM and CodeT5+ 220M-Based Code Transformation

Description

Web applications commonly process user-controlled input and perform backend database operations. If application input reaches database query processing without sufficient separation between application data and query logic, an attacker may manipulate the intended database operation through SQL Injection.

OWASP Juice Shop provides an intentionally vulnerable web application environment containing SQL Injection scenarios that can be used for controlled security testing and vulnerability validation.

In this use case, an existing OWASP Juice Shop application is deployed as a controlled Docker container in an Ubuntu virtual machine. The containerized application provides the target environment for reproducing the SQL Injection vulnerability before and after AI-assisted remediation.

Kali Linux is used as the controlled penetration-testing system.

A controlled SQL Injection Attack assessment is performed against the authorized laboratory application. The assessment first identifies the exposed application and selected SQL Injection functionality and then validates the vulnerable behavior using controlled security-testing inputs.

sqlmap is used as the primary SQL Injection penetration-testing tool because it is specifically designed to identify and validate SQL Injection vulnerabilities in web applications. Nmap is used for service discovery and network exposure assessment.

Semgrep is used for static security analysis of the vulnerable and patched source code. Docker is used to deploy and redeploy the vulnerable and patched application in isolated containers.

The SVM model is used to classify source-code samples according to SQL Injection-related vulnerability patterns. CodeT5+ 220M is used to transform identified vulnerable source code toward a security-improved implementation.

The public SQL Injection vulnerability-fix dataset is processed to obtain vulnerable and corresponding fixed source-code examples for vulnerability classification and vulnerable-to-fixed code transformation.

The generated security patch is then applied to a separate application source-code copy. A patched Docker image is built and deployed, and the same controlled SQL Injection assessment is repeated to determine whether the previously demonstrated vulnerability remains reproducible.

The complete security-validation workflow is:
OWASP Juice Shop Source Code
→
Docker Application Deployment
→
Network Service Discovery
→
SQL Injection Baseline Testing
→
Public Vulnerability-Fix Data Processing
→
SVM Vulnerability Classification
→
CodeT5+ 220M Code Transformation
→
Security Patch Generation
→
Static Security Analysis
→
Patched Docker Image
→
Application Redeployment
→
SQL Injection Reassessment
→
Before-and-After Security Validation

Existing Security Problem

Application : OWASP Juice Shop

OWASP Juice Shop is the target intentionally vulnerable web application in this use case.

It provides controlled application functionality containing SQL Injection scenarios that can be used to evaluate vulnerability identification, AI-assisted source-code repair, and post-remediation security behavior.

Existing Problem :

A web application may process user-controlled input through backend database functionality without sufficiently separating application data from database query logic.

If the vulnerable source-code condition remains present, an attacker may submit crafted input that changes the intended database query behavior and potentially causes unauthorized database operations.

The security problem is:
OWASP Juice Shop Application
→
Docker-Hosted Web Application
→
Network-Accessible Application Service
→
User-Controlled Input
→
Database Query Processing
→
Insufficient Query and Input Separation
→
Attacker-Controlled SQL Manipulation
→
Unauthorized Database Query Behavior
→
SQL Injection Vulnerability
→
Application Security Risk

The proposed solution introduces application deployment through Docker, network exposure assessment using Nmap, controlled SQL Injection validation using sqlmap, SVM-based vulnerability classification, CodeT5+ 220M-based code transformation, static security analysis using Semgrep, patched-container deployment, and post-remediation SQL Injection testing.

Attack

Specific Attack: SQL Injection Attack

The controlled attack scenario evaluates whether attacker-controlled input can influence database query processing in the selected OWASP Juice Shop functionality.

The objective is to determine whether the selected functionality demonstrates SQL Injection behavior before remediation and whether the same controlled attack condition is prevented or mitigated after the AI-generated security patch is deployed.

Attack Behavior :
Kali Linux Testing Client
→
Nmap Application Service Discovery
→
OWASP Juice Shop Functionality Identification
→
sqlmap SQL Injection Assessment
→
Controlled SQL Injection Input
→
Vulnerable Query Processing
→
SQL Query Manipulation
→
SQL Injection Finding
→
AI-Assisted Source-Code Remediation
→
Patched Docker Container
→
Post-Remediation SQL Injection Validation

Security Concept

AI-Assisted Vulnerability Classification and Code Transformation

The primary security concept is AI-Assisted Vulnerability Classification combined with automated code transformation and controlled penetration testing.

The objective is to identify source-code patterns associated with SQL Injection vulnerabilities and use an AI code-transformation model to generate a candidate security repair for the identified vulnerable source code.

The SVM classification stage identifies source-code samples requiring further vulnerability-repair processing, while CodeT5+ 220M performs the vulnerable-to-fixed source-code transformation.

The assessment follows:
Application Architecture Review
→
Docker Application Deployment
→
Service Exposure Discovery
→
SQL Injection Baseline Testing
→
Public Vulnerability-Fix Data Preparation
→
SVM Vulnerability Classification
→
Vulnerable Source-Code Identification
→
CodeT5+ 220M Code Transformation
→
Security Patch Generation
→
Static Security Analysis
→
Patched Docker Image Creation
→
Application Redeployment
→
Post-Remediation SQL Injection Testing
→
Final Security Validation

Defensive Mechanism

The security concept defines the overall security strategy.

The following are the specific defensive mechanisms implemented.

Docker Application Isolation :

OWASP Juice Shop is deployed in a controlled Docker container so that the vulnerable and patched application states can be reproduced independently.

Purpose: Provide an isolated and repeatable application-testing environment.

SVM-Based Vulnerability Classification

The SVM model classifies prepared source-code samples according to SQL Injection-related vulnerability patterns learned from the public vulnerability-fix data.

Purpose
  • Identify source-code patterns associated with SQL Injection vulnerabilities.

CodeT5+ 220M Code Transformation

CodeT5+ 220M processes the identified vulnerable source-code region and generates a candidate security-repaired implementation.

Purpose
  • Generate a candidate security repair from vulnerable source code.

Vulnerable-to-Fixed Code Transformation

Vulnerable and corresponding fixed source-code examples are used to support transformation from insecure implementation toward a security-improved implementation.

Purpose
  • Guide the AI model toward vulnerable-to-fixed source-code transformation.

Static Security Analysis

Semgrep is used to inspect vulnerable and patched source code for SQL Injection-related patterns and unintended source-code changes.

Purpose
  • Identify residual security weaknesses before runtime validation.

SQL Injection Security Testing

sqlmap is used to perform controlled SQL Injection testing against the authorized laboratory application.

Purpose
  • Validate whether the selected SQL Injection vulnerability is exploitable before and after remediation.

Network Service Discovery

Nmap is used to identify the network-accessible application service and establish the initial application attack surface.

Purpose
  • Identify the exposed application service and validate network exposure.

Patched Application Deployment

A new Docker image is created from the patched source code and deployed as the remediated application environment.

Purpose
  • Validate the generated security patch in an isolated runtime environment.

Application Functional Validation

The patched application is tested using legitimate application functionality after remediation.

Purpose
  • Confirm that the generated security repair does not unnecessarily break intended application behavior.

Before-and-After Security Validation

The vulnerable and patched application states are compared using static analysis, SQL Injection testing, application execution, and source-code changes.

Purpose
  • Determine the security improvement produced by the generated repair.

Security Tools

Primary SQL Injection Penetration-Testing Tool: sqlmap

sqlmap is the primary penetration-testing tool because it is specifically designed for controlled SQL Injection detection and validation against web applications.

Purpose
  • Identify SQL Injection behavior.
  • Perform controlled SQL Injection testing.
  • Validate the vulnerable application state.
  • Repeat the same assessment after remediation.
  • Compare pre-remediation and post-remediation results.

Application Service Discovery Tool: Nmap

Nmap is used to identify the network-accessible application service and establish the initial attack surface.

Purpose
  • Discover the application service.
  • Identify the exposed application port.
  • Validate network reachability.
  • Perform post-remediation service discovery.

Target Vulnerable Web Application: OWASP Juice Shop

OWASP Juice Shop provides the existing vulnerable application used for controlled SQL Injection testing and AI-assisted vulnerability remediation.

Purpose
  • Provide the target application.
  • Provide an existing SQL Injection scenario.
  • Support controlled security testing.
  • Support before-and-after validation.

Application Deployment Platform: Docker

Docker is used to deploy the vulnerable and patched application states as separate controlled containers.

Purpose
  • Deploy the vulnerable application
  • Build the patched application image
  • Create repeatable application environments.
  • Separate vulnerable and patched application states.

Static Security Analysis Tool: Semgrep

Semgrep is used to inspect vulnerable and patched source code for security-relevant patterns.

Purpose
  • Analyze vulnerable source code.
  • Inspect AI-generated patches.
  • Identify SQL Injection-related patterns.
  • Compare static findings before and after remediation.

AI Vulnerability Classification Algorithm: Support Vector Machine (SVM)

SVM is used as the machine-learning classification algorithm for identifying source-code samples associated with SQL Injection vulnerability patterns.

Purpose
  • Process prepared source-code features.
  • Classify vulnerability-related source-code samples.
  • Identify source code requiring repair.
  • Provide the classification stage before AI patch generation.

AI Code Transformation Model: CodeT5+ 220M

CodeT5+ 220M is used as the AI model for vulnerable-to-fixed source-code transformation and candidate security-patch generation.

Purpose
  • Process vulnerable source-code input.
  • Generate candidate repaired source code.
  • Support vulnerable-to-fixed transformation.
  • Provide the candidate patch for validation.

Programming and Data Processing Environment: Python

Python is used for public vulnerability-fix data processing, feature preparation, SVM processing, CodeT5+ 220M model interaction, evaluation, and workflow automation.

Purpose
  • Process public vulnerability-fix data.
  • Prepare model inputs.
  • Execute the AI-assisted remediation workflow.
  • Automate experiment processing.

Security Testing Platform: Kali Linux

Kali Linux provides the controlled penetration-testing environment.

Purpose
  • Execute Nmap.
  • Execute sqlmap.
  • Perform controlled SQL Injection testing.
  • Validate post-remediation security behavior.

Application and AI Processing Platform: Ubuntu Linux

Ubuntu provides the controlled environment for Docker, source-code processing, AI experimentation, static analysis, and application execution.

Purpose
  • Host Docker.
  • Run the application environment.
  • Run Python-based AI processing.
  • Execute Semgrep.
  • Support application rebuilding and validation.

Virtualization Platform: VirtualBox

VirtualBox provides the isolated laboratory environment for separating the Ubuntu application environment and Kali Linux testing environment.

Purpose
  • Host Ubuntu.
  • Host Kali Linux.
  • Isolate application and security-testing activities.
  • Support repeatable laboratory testing.

Process

STEP 01

Prepare the Isolated SQL Injection Penetration-Testing Environment

  • Create an isolated cybersecurity laboratory using VirtualBox.
  • Configure Ubuntu as the application and AI-processing environment.
  • Configure Kali Linux as the penetration-testing system.
  • Establish controlled network communication between the virtual machines.
  • Assign stable laboratory IP addresses.
  • Verify communication between Kali Linux and Ubuntu.
  • Confirm that all SQL Injection testing is restricted to the authorized laboratory.
Tools: VirtualBox + Ubuntu + Kali Linux
STEP 02

Prepare Docker for OWASP Juice Shop Deployment

  • Verify that Docker is available in the Ubuntu environment.
  • Prepare the Docker environment required to deploy the existing OWASP Juice Shop application.
  • Configure the required container networking.
  • Start the application container using the approved laboratory configuration.
  • Verify that the container is running.
  • Confirm that the application interface is accessible from the authorized testing environment.
Tools: Docker + Ubuntu + OWASP Juice Shop
STEP 03

Establish the Legitimate Application Baseline

  • Access the deployed OWASP Juice Shop application using the normal application interface.
  • Identify the selected functionality used for the experiment.
  • Perform the intended legitimate operation.
  • Verify that the application responds correctly to normal input.
  • Record the expected application behavior.
  • Preserve the legitimate application state as the functional baseline.
Tools: OWASP Juice Shop + Docker + Browser
STEP 04

Identify the Application Network Exposure

  • Identify the authorized Docker-hosted application from Kali Linux.
  • Perform controlled Nmap service discovery.
  • Identify the exposed application port.
  • Determine whether the application service is reachable from the Kali testing network.
  • Record the network exposure.
  • Compare the observed exposure with the intended laboratory application architecture.
Tools: Nmap + Kali Linux + Docker
STEP 05

Perform the Controlled SQL Injection Baseline Assessment

  • Identify the selected SQL Injection functionality in the deployed application.
  • Configure Kali Linux as the authorized security-testing client.
  • Use sqlmap to perform controlled SQL Injection assessment against the selected application functionality.
  • Record the SQL Injection detection result.
  • Determine whether the vulnerable behavior is reproducible.
  • Preserve the original vulnerability evidence for later comparison.
Tools: sqlmap + Kali Linux + OWASP Juice Shop
STEP 06

Obtain the Public SQL Injection Vulnerability-Fix Dataset

  • Obtain a public vulnerability-fix dataset containing SQL Injection-related vulnerable and corresponding fixed source-code examples.
  • Identify the source-code information required for vulnerability classification and vulnerable-to-fixed transformation.
  • Retain the correspondence between vulnerable source code and its associated fixed source code.
  • Prepare the data for preprocessing.
  • Confirm that the source-code examples are suitable for the selected research workflow.
Tools: Public SQL Injection Vulnerability-Fix Dataset + Python + Git
STEP 07

Perform Vulnerability-Fix Data Preprocessing

  • Extract the relevant vulnerable and fixed source-code samples from the public dataset.
  • Normalize the source-code representation.
  • Remove unnecessary information that is not required for classification and transformation.
  • Preserve the correspondence between vulnerable and fixed source-code samples.
  • Prepare the processed data for the SVM and CodeT5+ 220M stages.
Tools: Python + Dataset Processing Scripts
STEP 08

Train and Evaluate the SVM Vulnerability Classifier

  • Convert the processed source-code samples into features suitable for SVM classification.
  • Assign the required vulnerability-related labels.
  • Separate the prepared data into training and evaluation portions.
  • Train the SVM classifier using the prepared source-code vulnerability data.
  • Evaluate the classifier using the reserved evaluation samples.
  • Record the classification results before applying the model to the target source code.
Tools: Python + scikit-learn + SVM
STEP 09

Prepare CodeT5+ 220M Vulnerable-to-Fixed Transformation Data

  • Prepare vulnerable and corresponding fixed source-code pairs for the code-transformation stage.
  • Use vulnerable source code as the input representation.
  • Use corresponding fixed source code as the target representation.
  • Apply the required tokenization and preprocessing.
  • Prepare the transformation data for CodeT5+ 220M model execution.
Tools: Python + CodeT5+ 220M + Tokenizer
STEP 10

Configure the CodeT5+ 220M Model

  • Load the pretrained CodeT5+ 220M model in the CPU-based experimental environment.
  • Prepare the model input and output format required for vulnerable-to-fixed source-code transformation.
  • Configure a resource-conscious experimental setup suitable for the available CPU and memory.
  • Verify that the model can process the prepared source-code input.
  • Prepare the model for candidate security-patch generation.
Tools: Python + PyTorch + CodeT5+ 220M
STEP 11

Extract the Target Vulnerable Source Code

  • Identify the source-code component associated with the selected OWASP Juice Shop SQL Injection functionality.
  • Extract the relevant source-code region required for vulnerability classification and repair.
  • Preserve the original vulnerable source code without modification.
  • Prepare the source-code representation for the trained SVM classifier.
  • Retain the original source-code version for before-and-after comparison.
Tools: OWASP Juice Shop Source Code + Python + Git
STEP 12

Perform AI-Based Vulnerability Classification

  • Provide the prepared target source-code representation to the trained SVM classifier.
  • Determine whether the selected source-code region matches the SQL Injection-related patterns learned during training.
  • Review the classification result.
  • Determine whether the source code should proceed to the CodeT5+ 220M repair stage.
  • Record the classification evidence.
Tools: Python + SVM + scikit-learn
STEP 13

Generate the Candidate Security Patch

  • Provide the identified vulnerable source-code region to CodeT5+ 220M.
  • Generate a candidate source-code transformation intended to remove or mitigate the SQL Injection weakness.
  • Store the generated source code separately from the original vulnerable implementation.
  • Review the generated transformation.
  • Prepare the generated output for static analysis and patch application.
Tools: Python + CodeT5+ 220M + PyTorch
STEP 14

Apply and Analyze the Generated Patch

  • Compare the generated source code with the original vulnerable implementation.
  • Review the modified source-code region.
  • Apply the candidate patch to a separate working copy of the OWASP Juice Shop source code.
  • Check the generated modification for syntactic and functional consistency.
  • Preserve the original vulnerable source-code copy for comparison.
  • Document the generated source-code changes.
Tools: CodeT5+ 220M + Git + Python + Source-Code Editor
STEP 15

Perform Static Analysis and Build the Patched Docker Image

  • Run Semgrep against the patched source code.
  • Review the static-analysis results for remaining SQL Injection-related indicators.
  • Check for unintended source-code changes.
  • Build a new Docker image from the patched application source code.
  • Start the patched application as a separate Docker container.
  • Verify that the patched application starts successfully.
Tools: Semgrep + Docker + OWASP Juice Shop + Ubuntu
STEP 16

Perform Post-Remediation SQL Injection Penetration Testing

  • Identify the network endpoint of the patched Docker container.
  • Perform Nmap service discovery against the patched application.
  • Use sqlmap to repeat the same controlled SQL Injection assessment performed during the initial baseline.
  • Use the same target functionality and equivalent testing conditions.
  • Record the post-remediation SQL Injection result.
  • Compare the result with the original vulnerable-state evidence.
  • Preserve the post-remediation penetration-testing evidence.
Tools: Nmap + sqlmap + Kali Linux + Docker + OWASP Juice Shop
STEP 17

Validate Legitimate Application Functionality

  • Access the patched Docker container using the normal application interface.
  • Execute the legitimate functionality used during the initial baseline.
  • Verify that normal application input continues to work correctly.
  • Confirm that the security repair does not unnecessarily break the selected functionality.
  • Compare the patched application behavior with the original functional baseline.
  • Record the final application behavior.
Tools: Docker + OWASP Juice Shop + Browser + npm
STEP 18

Perform Final AI-Based Security Validation and Advisory Review

  • Compare the initial and final Nmap service-discovery results.
  • Compare the original and post-remediation sqlmap results.
  • Compare the Semgrep findings from the vulnerable and patched source code.
  • Review the SVM vulnerability-classification result.
  • Review the CodeT5+ 220M-generated source-code transformation.
  • Review the differences between the vulnerable and patched application source code.
  • Confirm that the patched Docker container executes successfully.
  • Confirm that the previously demonstrated SQL Injection behavior is no longer reproducible or is appropriately mitigated.
  • Record residual security risks and limitations of the generated repair.
  • Document the complete AI-assisted vulnerability-remediation result.
  • Finalize the security assessment and research evidence.
Tools: Nmap + sqlmap + Semgrep + SVM + CodeT5+ 220M + Docker + Kali Linux + OWASP Juice Shop

Outcome

An OWASP Juice Shop application is successfully deployed in an isolated Docker environment on Ubuntu for controlled SQL Injection security testing and AI-assisted vulnerability remediation.

The legitimate application functionality and network exposure are established using the deployed Docker application and Nmap service discovery.

A controlled SQL Injection assessment is performed using sqlmap against the selected application functionality, establishing the vulnerable-state security baseline.

The public SQL Injection vulnerability-fix dataset is processed to obtain vulnerable and corresponding fixed source-code examples for SVM classification and CodeT5+ 220M-based vulnerable-to-fixed transformation.

The SVM model is trained and evaluated using the prepared vulnerability-related source-code data and is used to classify the selected target source-code region.

The CodeT5+ 220M model processes the identified vulnerable source code and generates a candidate security repair based on the prepared vulnerable-to-fixed transformation data.

The generated patch is applied to a separate source-code copy, analyzed using Semgrep, and used to create a patched Docker image for isolated runtime validation.

The patched Docker application is subjected to the same Nmap and sqlmap security-testing process used during the initial assessment to determine whether the SQL Injection behavior remains reproducible.

The legitimate application functionality is validated after remediation to confirm that the AI-generated security repair does not unnecessarily prevent the intended application operation.

The complete Docker deployment, Nmap service discovery, sqlmap SQL Injection testing, SVM vulnerability classification, CodeT5+ 220M code transformation, Semgrep static analysis, patched-container deployment, post-remediation testing, and before-and-after security-validation workflow is successfully demonstrated.