Location Research Breakthrough Possible @S-Logix pro@slogix.in

Random Forest-Based SSH Honeypot Behavioral Profiling Against Brute-Force Login and Suspicious Command-Execution Attempts Using Cowrie Session Logs

Description

SSH (Secure Shell) is a network protocol commonly used to access and manage remote Linux systems. SSH services may be targeted by attackers attempting repeated authentication requests, username and password guessing, and suspicious command interactions after establishing a session.

Cowrie is an SSH honeypot designed to record login attempts and simulated shell interactions. It captures information such as connection details, attempted usernames, authentication outcomes, session identifiers, and commands entered into the simulated environment. These records provide useful evidence for analyzing SSH interaction patterns without exposing a real production shell.

In this use case, Cowrie is deployed on an Ubuntu Linux virtual machine, while Kali Linux is used as the controlled security-testing environment. SSH login attempts and harmless simulated command interactions are generated within an isolated Oracle VirtualBox laboratory. Cowrie records the activity, and Python processes the resulting session logs into structured data.

A publicly available SSH honeypot dataset is used to study existing SSH interaction patterns and support model development and evaluation. The Random Forest classification algorithm is applied to suitable labeled records to classify predefined SSH behavioral categories, such as brute-force-like login activity and suspicious command-interaction activity, where the available labels and features support those distinctions.

The trained model is evaluated using unseen test records and appropriate classification metrics. The predictions are also reviewed alongside controlled Cowrie session records to determine whether the model can identify the predefined behavioral patterns. The model provides behavioral classification results for investigation; it does not independently confirm that a source is malicious.

The complete security-analysis workflow is:

Publicly Available SSH Honeypot Dataset + Controlled Cowrie Session Logs → Dataset and Log Analysis → Data Preprocessing → Behavioral Feature Extraction → Label Validation → Random Forest Model Training → SSH Behavior Classification → Prediction Validation → Security Evidence Review → Model Performance Evaluation

Existing Security Problem

Application/Service: Cowrie SSH Honeypot

Cowrie is the SSH honeypot service used in this use case. It records controlled SSH login attempts and simulated shell interactions, producing session logs for security analysis.

Existing Problem :

SSH honeypots can generate numerous records containing authentication attempts, connection metadata, and simulated command interactions. Reviewing these records manually can be time-consuming, particularly when the objective is to distinguish repeated login guessing from other suspicious interaction patterns.

Cowrie provides records of observed activity, but collecting logs alone does not automatically classify each session according to predefined behavioral categories. A separate data-processing and classification workflow is required to extract meaningful features, learn patterns from labeled records, and evaluate the resulting predictions.

The security problem is:
SSH Honeypot Service
→
Repeated Login Attempts and Simulated Command Interactions
→
Cowrie Session Log Generation
→
Large Volumes of Raw Session Records
→
Manual Behavioral Analysis
→
Difficulty Classifying Different Activity Pattern
→
Structured Feature Extraction Required
→
Random Forest-Based Behavioral Classification
→
Prediction Validation Against Recorded Evidence

The proposed solution introduces Cowrie log collection, publicly available dataset analysis, behavioral feature extraction, Random Forest model training, classification of unseen records, evaluation of prediction accuracy, and evidence-based review of the classified SSH activity.

Attack

Specific Attack: SSH Brute-Force Login Attempts and Suspicious Command-Interaction Attempts Against a Cowrie SSH Honeypot

The controlled attack scenario evaluates SSH activity patterns by generating repeated login attempts and harmless simulated command interactions against the Cowrie honeypot in an authorized laboratory.

Kali Linux is used to generate the controlled test activity. Cowrie records the connections, authentication outcomes, and simulated session interactions. These records are processed to identify features that can help distinguish the predefined behavioral categories.

The objective is to assess whether the Random Forest classifier can classify the recorded activity based on patterns learned from labeled data. The assessment is performed only against the user's own isolated laboratory environment; it does not involve attacking a real SSH server.

Attack Behavior :
Kali Linux Security-Testing System
→
Controlled SSH Login Attempts
→
Cowrie SSH Honeypot Receives Connections
→
Authentication Outcomes and Session Interactions Recorded
→
Harmless Simulated Command Inputs Captured
→
Cowrie Session Logs Collected
→
Behavioral Features Extracted
→
Random Forest Classification
→
Predicted Categories Compared with Known Test Labels
→
Classification Results and Misclassifications Reviewed

Security Concept

Machine-Learning-Based SSH Behavioral Classification and Security Validation

The primary security concept is machine-learning-based behavioral classification combined with evidence-based security validation.

The Random Forest algorithm uses multiple decision trees to classify records according to patterns learned from labeled training data. In this use case, suitable features may include login-attempt counts, authentication outcomes, session duration, attempted-username patterns, and command-interaction indicators, depending on the fields available in the dataset and Cowrie logs.

The model is trained using labeled records and evaluated against unseen test records. Precision, recall, F1-score, and a confusion matrix are used to examine classification performance. Controlled Cowrie records provide additional evidence for assessing whether the complete workflow behaves as intended.

The assessment follows:
Cowrie Session Log Collection
→
Publicly Available Dataset Analysis
→
Behavioral Category and Label Validation
→
Data Cleaning and Preprocessing
→
Feature Extraction
→
Training and Testing Data Separation
→
Random Forest Model Training
→
Classification of Unseen Records
→
Precision, Recall, F1-Score and Confusion Matrix
→
Controlled Cowrie Record Assessment
→
Prediction Review Against Session Evidence
→
Final Model Performance Evaluation

Defensive Mechanism

The security concept defines the overall approach for analyzing SSH behavior.

The following are the specific defensive mechanisms implemented.

SSH Honeypot Isolation :

Cowrie is deployed within an isolated Ubuntu virtual machine to capture controlled SSH interactions without exposing a production SSH service.

Purpose: Safely collect SSH activity for laboratory-based behavioral analysis.

Structured Session Log Collection

Cowrie session logs are collected and processed into a consistent format before machine-learning analysis.

Purpose
  • Convert raw SSH interaction records into structured data suitable for classification.

Data Cleaning and Validation

Python-based preprocessing checks required fields, handles missing values, identifies duplicate records where appropriate, and validates feature representations.

Purpose
  • Reduce data-quality issues that could affect classification results.

Behavioral Feature Extraction

Relevant features are extracted from the dataset and Cowrie logs according to the fields available and the classification objective.

Purpose
  • Represent SSH interaction patterns in a format that the Random Forest model can process.

Random Forest Classification

A Random Forest classifier is trained on labeled records to classify predefined SSH behavioral categories.

Purpose
  • Identify behavioral patterns in SSH records using a supervised machine-learning model.

Training and Testing Data Separation

The available labeled records are divided into training and testing portions, with suitable grouping where related records could otherwise appear in both sets.

Purpose
  • Reduce evaluation bias and measure model performance on records not used during training.

Classification Performance Evaluation

Model predictions are compared with known test labels using precision, recall, F1-score, and a confusion matrix.

Purpose
  • Measure classification performance and identify the types of incorrect predictions.

Evidence-Based Prediction Review

Predicted categories are reviewed alongside the original Cowrie session records and the known characteristics of the controlled test scenarios.

Purpose
  • Ensure that classification results are interpreted using recorded evidence rather than treated as automatic proof of malicious activity.

Controlled Security Testing

Kali Linux generates authorized test interactions against the Cowrie honeypot in the isolated laboratory.

Purpose
  • Produce controlled session records for evaluating the complete log-analysis and classification workflow.

Model and Result Documentation

Dataset preparation, selected features, model settings, evaluation metrics, and limitations are recorded.

Purpose
  • Maintain reproducible evidence of the model-development and security-validation process.

Security Tools

Primary SSH Honeypot Tool: Cowrie

Cowrie is the primary SSH honeypot because it captures SSH login attempts and simulated shell interactions and generates session logs for analysis.

Purpose
  • Record SSH connection and authentication activity.
  • Capture simulated command interactions and available session metadata.
  • Generate log evidence for behavioral feature extraction.
  • Provide controlled SSH interaction records for testing.
  • Support review of predicted classifications against recorded activity.

Machine-Learning Classification Tool: scikit-learn

scikit-learn provides the Random Forest classifier and supporting data-splitting and evaluation utilities required for the machine-learning workflow.

Purpose
  • Train the Random Forest model using labeled records.
  • Generate predictions for unseen test records.
  • Calculate precision, recall, and F1-score.
  • Generate a confusion matrix for classification analysis.
  • Support repeatable model evaluation.

Programming and Data Processing Tool: Python

Python is used to integrate Cowrie log processing, dataset preparation, feature extraction, model training, and evaluation.

Purpose
  • Parse and process available Cowrie session records.
  • Prepare structured data for machine-learning analysis.
  • Connect preprocessing and classification components.
  • Generate prediction results and evaluation outputs.

Data Analysis Tool: pandas

pandas is used to load, inspect, clean, transform, and organize SSH dataset records and Cowrie logs into tabular structures.

Purpose
  • Read structured dataset files and log-derived records.
  • Identify missing values and duplicate records.
  • Organize behavioral features into data tables.
  • Prepare input features and target labels for model development.

Numerical Processing Tool: NumPy

NumPy supports numerical operations and data transformations used during preprocessing and analysis.

Purpose
  • Perform numerical data operations.
  • Support feature preparation and data validation.
  • Assist with numerical analysis during model evaluation.

Security Testing Platform: Kali Linux

Kali Linux provides the controlled security-testing environment used to generate SSH interactions against the Cowrie honeypot.

Purpose
  • Generate authorized SSH login attempts.
  • Perform controlled authentication testing against the honeypot.
  • Enter harmless commands in the simulated SSH environment.
  • Produce test activity for evaluating the log-analysis workflow.

Target Platform: Ubuntu Linux

Ubuntu Linux hosts Cowrie and the supporting components required for session-log collection and analysis.

Purpose
  • Run the SSH honeypot service.
  • Store and provide access to Cowrie session logs.
  • Support the laboratory's log-processing workflow.
  • Provide the controlled Linux environment for the assessment.

Publicly Available SSH Honeypot Dataset: Dataset Source

A publicly available SSH honeypot dataset is used to study existing SSH interaction patterns and support model development and evaluation. The dataset name is not specified in this document.

Purpose
  • Provide existing SSH interaction records for initial data analysis.
  • Support feature exploration and model-development activities.
  • Provide labeled records for training or evaluation when suitable labels are available.
  • Help assess model performance against records separate from the controlled laboratory logs.

Virtualization Platform: Oracle VirtualBox

Oracle VirtualBox provides the isolated virtual-machine environment for Ubuntu Linux and Kali Linux.

Purpose
  • Host the Ubuntu honeypot environment.
  • Host the Kali Linux testing environment.
  • Provide a controlled network for laboratory interactions.
  • Reduce the risk of unintended interaction with production systems.

Network Analysis Tool: Wireshark

Wireshark is used when required to inspect network-level information about controlled SSH connections between Kali Linux and the Cowrie host.

Purpose
  • Verify network connectivity to the intended laboratory host.
  • Inspect SSH connection and packet-level metadata.
  • Provide supporting evidence of network communication.
  • Assist with troubleshooting connectivity issues without assuming that encrypted SSH payloads reveal plaintext commands.

Process

STEP 01

Prepare the Isolated SSH Honeypot Environment

  • Create an isolated cybersecurity laboratory using Oracle VirtualBox.
  • Configure Ubuntu Linux as the Cowrie honeypot host.
  • Configure Kali Linux as the security-testing system.
  • Establish controlled network communication between the virtual machines.
  • Verify that Kali can reach the intended Ubuntu laboratory host.
  • Confirm that all testing is restricted to the authorized laboratory environment.
Tools: Oracle VirtualBox + Ubuntu Linux + Kali Linux
STEP 02

Install and Configure Cowrie

  • Install Cowrie on the Ubuntu virtual machine.
  • Configure the SSH honeypot service according to the laboratory requirements.
  • Start the service and verify that it is running.
  • Review the configured listening address and port.
  • Verify that the session-logging mechanism is operational.
  • Record the initial Cowrie configuration for later reference.
Tools: Cowrie + Ubuntu Linux
STEP 03

Verify SSH Honeypot Connectivity

  • From Kali Linux, establish a controlled SSH connection to the configured Cowrie address and port.
  • Verify that the connection reaches the intended honeypot.
  • Check the corresponding Cowrie records.
  • Confirm that connection and session information is recorded as expected.
  • Resolve any connectivity or logging issues before generating the test scenarios.
Tools: Kali Linux + Cowrie + Wireshark
STEP 04

Generate Controlled SSH Login Attempts

  • Perform a limited set of authorized login attempts against the Cowrie honeypot.
  • Use predefined test usernames and credentials to generate representative authentication activity.
  • Include repeated login attempts to produce a controlled brute-force-like test pattern.
  • Observe the authentication responses provided by the honeypot.
  • Verify that the resulting activity is recorded in Cowrie session logs.
  • Keep the testing rate limited and confined to the isolated laboratory.
Tools: Kali Linux + Cowrie
STEP 05

Generate Controlled Command Interactions

  • Establish a controlled interaction with the Cowrie simulated shell where supported by its configuration.
  • Enter harmless test commands to produce representative command-interaction records.
  • Use only the simulated honeypot environment; do not execute destructive commands or target a real system.
  • Verify that the interaction records contain the relevant session information.
  • Record the test scenario so that the generated activity can be reviewed later.
Tools: Kali Linux + Cowrie
STEP 06

Collect Cowrie Session Logs

  • Locate the Cowrie session logs generated during the controlled tests.
  • Collect the relevant connection records, authentication outcomes, session identifiers, timestamps, and recorded command interactions where available.
  • Preserve the original records before preprocessing.
  • Check that the collected records correspond to the intended test scenarios.
  • Store the records in a suitable location for analysis.
Tools: Cowrie + Ubuntu Linux + Python
STEP 07

Obtain the Publicly Available Dataset

  • Obtain a publicly available SSH honeypot dataset appropriate for the intended behavioral-classification task.
  • Review its documentation and available fields.
  • Determine whether the dataset contains relevant SSH activity records and reliable behavioral labels.
  • Check the terms governing the dataset's use.
  • Keep the dataset records distinct from newly generated Cowrie laboratory logs so that the sources can be evaluated separately.
Tools: Python + pandas
STEP 08

Inspect the Dataset and Available Log Fields

  • Load the selected dataset and inspect its structure.
  • Identify available authentication, connection, session, and interaction fields.
  • Examine the existing labels and the distribution of the represented categories.
  • Check for missing values, inconsistent formats, duplicate records, and class imbalance.
  • Compare the available fields with those extracted from the controlled Cowrie logs.
  • Document any differences that could prevent direct comparison between the dataset and laboratory records.
Tools: Python + pandas + NumPy
STEP 09

Define and Validate Behavioral Categories

  • Define the behavioral categories that the Random Forest model is expected to classify.
  • Use the dataset's existing labels where they reliably represent the intended categories.
  • For controlled test records, document the known scenario associated with each record.
  • Only define separate brute-force-like and suspicious command-interaction categories if the available labels and features support those distinctions.
  • Do not assume that every failed login represents a brute-force attack or that every command interaction is malicious.
  • Check that the target labels are sufficiently consistent for supervised machine-learning training.
Tools: Python + pandas
STEP 10

Extract Behavioral Features

  • Extract relevant features from the available dataset and Cowrie session logs.
  • Candidate features may include login-attempt counts, authentication outcomes, session duration, attempted-username patterns, and command-interaction indicators, depending on the available fields.
  • Transform supported fields into consistent numerical or categorical representations.
  • Exclude target labels and identifiers that could allow the model to memorize individual records.
  • Ensure that each selected feature can also be obtained at the time the model is expected to classify new records.
  • Document the final feature list used for training and prediction.
Tools: Python + pandas + NumPy
STEP 11

Clean and Prepare the Dataset

  • Handle missing values according to the selected preprocessing strategy.
  • Normalize inconsistent representations of categorical fields where required.
  • Remove duplicate records where appropriate and investigate suspiciously repeated samples.
  • Check that feature values use consistent formats across training and testing data.
  • Separate model input features from the target labels.
  • Fit any learned preprocessing transformations using the training data only, then apply the same transformations to the test data to avoid data leakage.
Tools: Python + pandas + NumPy + scikit-learn
STEP 12

Split the Data for Model Evaluation

  • Divide the labeled records into training and testing portions.
  • Use a suitable stratified split when the class distribution allows it.
  • Where multiple records belong to the same session or source, consider a grouping strategy to reduce the chance of related records appearing in both sets.
  • Keep the test records separate from model training and model-selection activities.
  • Record the splitting method and the resulting class distribution.
  • Verify that the testing data contains the categories required for the planned evaluation.
Tools: Python + pandas + scikit-learn
STEP 13

Train the Random Forest Classifier

  • Configure a Random Forest classifier using scikit-learn.
  • Select suitable initial model settings, such as the number of decision trees and relevant depth or leaf-size constraints.
  • Train the classifier using the training features and validated target labels.
  • Record the selected features and model configuration.
  • Check for training errors and confirm that the model produces predictions for the expected classes.
  • Save the trained model and required preprocessing components when needed for repeatable evaluation.
Tools: Python + scikit-learn
STEP 14

Classify Unseen Test Records

  • Pass the held-out test features through the same preprocessing workflow used during training.
  • Apply the trained Random Forest classifier to generate predicted behavioral categories.
  • Preserve the predicted labels alongside the corresponding test-record identifiers.
  • Compare the predictions with the known labels without changing the test data based on the model's results.
  • Identify records for which the model's predictions disagree with the known labels.
  • Prepare the prediction output for performance evaluation.
Tools: Python + pandas + scikit-learn
STEP 15

Evaluate Classification Performance

  • Compare the predicted labels with the known labels of the test records.
  • Calculate precision, recall, and F1-score for the relevant categories.
  • Generate a confusion matrix to examine correct classifications and misclassification patterns.
  • Review class imbalance and the possibility that high overall accuracy may conceal poor performance on a less frequent category.
  • Record the evaluation results without inventing or assuming performance values.
  • Use the results to identify the model's strengths and limitations.
Tools: Python + pandas + scikit-learn
STEP 16

Assess the Model Using Controlled Cowrie Records

  • Process the controlled Cowrie session logs using the established feature-extraction workflow.
  • Check that the required features are compatible with those used to train the model.
  • Apply the trained classifier only when the input features and label definitions support meaningful interpretation.
  • Generate predictions for the selected laboratory records.
  • Compare the predictions with the known controlled scenarios.
  • Record incompatible fields, missing features, or differences between the public dataset and laboratory logs that could affect the assessment.
  • Treat this activity as a controlled validation exercise rather than proof of general performance across all SSH environments.
Tools: Cowrie + Python + pandas + scikit-learn
STEP 17

Review Predictions Against Session Evidence

  • Review the model's predicted categories alongside the corresponding Cowrie session records.
  • Check whether repeated login attempts, authentication outcomes, or recorded command interactions support the predicted category.
  • Investigate incorrect and uncertain predictions.
  • Distinguish observed behavior from the model's interpretation of that behavior.
  • Record cases where the available logs do not provide enough evidence to support a reliable classification.
  • Document the findings for the final assessment.
Tools: Cowrie + Python + pandas + scikit-learn
STEP 18

Complete Model and Security Validation

  • Compile the dataset preparation details, selected features, label definitions, training configuration, and evaluation results.
  • Preserve the relevant Cowrie logs and controlled test records.
  • Document precision, recall, F1-score, confusion-matrix results, and observed limitations.
  • Review the model's performance against the predefined objectives.
  • Record any feature-compatibility issues between the public dataset and controlled laboratory logs.
  • Finalize the evidence and conclusions, clearly distinguishing measured results from expected outcomes.
Tools: Cowrie + Python + pandas + scikit-learn + Oracle VirtualBox

Outcome

The system identifies SSH login attempts and suspicious command-execution activities recorded in Cowrie honeypot session logs.

Random Forest classifies SSH session behavior into predefined categories using selected behavioral features.

Authentication outcomes and repeated login attempts help identify patterns associated with potential brute-force activity.

Command-related features help identify suspicious command-execution behavior within recorded SSH sessions.

Publicly available SSH honeypot data supports model development and evaluation using appropriately prepared and labeled records.

Python, pandas, NumPy, and scikit-learn support data preprocessing, feature extraction, model training, and classification.

Model performance is evaluated using precision, recall, F1-score, and a confusion matrix to understand classification errors.

Cowrie session logs provide evidence for reviewing login attempts, recorded commands, session behavior, and classification results.

The isolated Ubuntu and Kali Linux environment enables controlled testing of SSH login attempts and harmless command interactions without targeting external systems.

The classification results help security analysts prioritize suspicious SSH sessions for further investigation and improve SSH threat monitoring.